I have been listening to various opinions around the news that a school in Kent is opening a Grammar School extension, thus circumventing the ban on opening new ones. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-34535778
The debate is whether Grammar Schools are good for society, and the argument against says that such schools do not necessarily benefit the best pupils in an area, but mainly those whose parents have money and resources to support their children to pass the admission exams.
So Grammar Schools are bad because they play into the class divide. Well, isn't the "regular" school system doing exactly the same, according to what I have explained in previous posts? Only those children with parents who care and can afford extra tuition, or are in a position to spend their own time working intensively with them, will really succeed - the others will be deceived into thinking they are doing well ("on target") and are bound for a surprise in the real world out there...
If you are against Grammar Schools, then be coherent, and challenge the current education system as well - it is doing exactly the same thing you hate Grammar Schools for! Or did you not know that those "targets" are calculated by agencies like the Fisher Family Trust on the basis of postcodes?
No comments:
Post a Comment